Readings Response
Molotov Man
This article chronicles two sides of an artistic appropriation dispute. I liken this scenario, and many others like it, to discourse within academic literature. 'Primary' texts are canonical works that propel disciplines. They are rooted in a particular historical context and interpretations, misinterpretations and appropriations that are rooted in their own unique context follow and serve to expand discourse. Upon reproduction, distortion and decontextualization the original history remains, it's importance is no less and elaborations, illuminations and new histories are created.
Visual communications are highly susceptible to reproductions and appropriation. However in the case of the 'Molotov Man,' the image is not the man. This is not to say that we should uncritically absorb/consume everything around us, unquestioningly accept distortions and manipulations of history, or accept images as truth, but stand to respond to history and use a varied repertoire of visual language in response to our own context.
Visual communications are highly susceptible to reproductions and appropriation. However in the case of the 'Molotov Man,' the image is not the man. This is not to say that we should uncritically absorb/consume everything around us, unquestioningly accept distortions and manipulations of history, or accept images as truth, but stand to respond to history and use a varied repertoire of visual language in response to our own context.
Interpretations of psychoanalysis pg 1 of 20 on Amazon.com
Ecstasy of Influence
The author takes an extreme stance in defence of appropriation and shared ideas. He notes different historical examples and the importance of appropriation in the proliferation of human understanding. The author uses examples from Thomas Jefferson including a quote I quite like, "He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me." The quote is in line with my sentiments from the last article (perhaps I read it somewhere before).
I feel that influence holds us back and propels us forward. I would like us to read an article in opposition of the ideas expounded in the two reading assignments, in order to understand when appropriation can be negative. I feel that this conversation is not so black and white. I can appreciate the use of these readings, as the dominant trend is to frown upon appropriation.
I feel that influence holds us back and propels us forward. I would like us to read an article in opposition of the ideas expounded in the two reading assignments, in order to understand when appropriation can be negative. I feel that this conversation is not so black and white. I can appreciate the use of these readings, as the dominant trend is to frown upon appropriation.
